
Mike Chambers has a post on his blog asking Flashers to describe their dream ActionScript Editor. While this is a good community exercise, this would be an excellent way to get ideas for the next version of the product. I'm not sure how Macromedia is going to use the information, but most product managers when the look at all the feature sets asked for by the users staring at them like this, would feel inclined to use at least 50% of them...
Let's take for example, take the ability to enhance the commenting feature. Here are some of the responses (most describe the functioning of the users' favorite software):
Now enter the product manager, who looks at all this set of features that are sitting in front of him/her and wondering "Wow! This is how I will be able to deliver a user centered product with all the features the users want"
However, this is NOT user centered design. Ask a user to describe their dream product and you'll get all sorts of answers. You can't add all these functionalities!
Now I'm not suggesting that the Product Managers at MM are planning to go this route, but in a smaller software company like mine, this is a great risk.
In fact, the next step at this point would be to accertain why the particular requests are coming up in the first place. What is the motivation? In this case I see only two:
You can solve the above goals either by giving an excellent (read bloated) commenting feature or you could use this information to think outside the box and come up with an innovative way to make the code more managable.
I wonder which way Macromedia will go...
Posted by Navneet at June 4, 2003 09:47 AM | TrackBack | Comments disabled due to spam| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |