Ray Ozzie of the Lotus Notes and Groove fame has put up an example of what he believes is prior art to the Eolas patent. Meaning that, since Lotus Notes, a commercially available program was able to perform all of the functions mentioned in the patent well before the patent was awarded, the patent should be invalidated...
Can this save the browser yet?
[via Slashdot]
Posted by Navneet at September 14, 2003 09:54 AM | TrackBack | Comments disabled due to spam| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
 |
 |
 |
 |
|